Our lawyers contributing to the Finland chapter of the Legal 500 M&A Comparative Guide
Petri Kyllönen, Pia Tanskanen and Lauri Koskenniemi have had the honor to serve as the exclusive contributors to the Finland chapter of The Legal 500 Mergers & Acquisitions Comparative Guide this year. The guide gives a practical overview of the laws and regulations in key jurisdictions, for specific practice areas. Made in a Q&A format, the guide provides a compact run-through of the core principles, laws and regulations applicable to M&A in Finland.
Full article here: Finland: Mergers & Acquisitions – Country Comparative Guides
#legal500 #mergers&acquisitions
-
Petri Kyllönen
Partner, Chairman of the Board, Attorney at Law
+358 40 0757 732
petri.kyllonen@procope.fi
-
Pia Tanskanen
Managing Partner, Attorney at Law, Trained on the Bench
+358 50 3143 143
pia.tanskanen@procope.fi
-
Procopé & Hornborg advises DL Data Oy in the acquisition by Verano, part of Nestit Group
Procopé & Hornborg advises DL Data Oy in the acquisition by Verano Eterno Oy, part of Nestit Group Ab. Post-transaction, DL Data will operate as a subsidiary of Verano. DL Data is an IT services company based in Lapua that provides IT maintenance, management, and support services to small and medium…
Reference – 6.5.2026
Procopé & Hornborg advised Gasgrid Finland Oy and Elering AS in insurance related matters concerning the damaged Balticconnector gas pipeline.
Balticconnector was damaged at the start of October 2023 by Hong Kong registered vessel m/v NewNew Polar Bear and its anchor. Approximately six months after the accident, the repairs were completed, and the Balticconnector has been back in operation from April 2024 onwards. Our assignment included c…
Reference – 6.5.2026
Procopé & Hornborg represented a Dutch company in FAI arbitration proceedings and assisted in the subsequent enforcement of the arbitral award regarding the costs of the arbitration in Belgium
We successfully represented a Dutch company in FAI arbitration proceedings where the tribunal accepted our client’s arguments and decided that it did not have jurisdiction to decide on the merits of the dispute and made an order terminating the arbitration proceedings. Subsequently, we advised on th…
Reference – 30.4.2026