Reference – 28.10.2019

Procopé & Hornborg advises Haltija Group on its business acquisition of Terttu Lilja Oy

Main contact

Pia Tanskanen

Managing Partner, Attorney at Law, Trained on the Bench

+358 50 3143 143

Procopé & Hornborg acted as the Legal Advisor of Haltija Group in its acquisition of the business of Terttu Lilja Oy. The acquired business of Terttu Lilja Oy consists of, among others, the healthcare and physical products and extensive knowledge relating to such products. 

Haltija Group Oy, a portfolio company of Sponsor Capital, is a Finnish company providing comprehensive solutions to various support and rehabilitation needs, as well as wellness technology. Haltija Group’s turnover in 2018 was appr. 23 million euros and it employs over 100 professionals.

Recent references

more references

REFERENCE – 6.5.2026

Procopé & Hornborg advises DL Data Oy in the acquisition by Verano, part of Nestit Group

Procopé & Hornborg advises DL Data Oy in the acquisition by Verano Eterno Oy, part of Nestit Group Ab. Post-transaction, DL Data will operate as a subsidiary of Verano. DL Data is an IT services company based in Lapua that provides IT maintenance, management, and support services to small and medium…

Reference – 6.5.2026

REFERENCE – 6.5.2026

Gasgrid Finland Oy and Elering AS were advised on the Balticconnector gas pipeline insurance claim

Balticconnector was damaged at the start of October 2023 by Hong Kong registered vessel m/v NewNew Polar Bear and its anchor. Approximately six months after the accident, the repairs were completed, and the Balticconnector has been back in operation from April 2024 onwards. Our assignment included c…

Reference – 6.5.2026

REFERENCE – 30.4.2026

Procopé & Hornborg represented a Dutch company in FAI arbitration proceedings and assisted in the subsequent enforcement of the arbitral award regarding the costs of the arbitration in Belgium

We successfully represented a Dutch company in FAI arbitration proceedings where the tribunal accepted our client’s arguments and decided that it did not have jurisdiction to decide on the merits of the dispute and made an order terminating the arbitration proceedings. Subsequently, we advised on th…

Reference – 30.4.2026

more references