Procopé & Hornborg advises Indutrade Oy on the divestment of the Tecalemit business operations to Danish Stenhøj Group
Main contact
Petri Kyllönen
Partner, Chairman of the Board, Attorney at Law
Indutrade Oy is a member of the Indutrade AB Group, a Swedish industrial group listed on Nasdaq Stockholm, Large Cap list, that conducts development and sales of high-tech components, systems and services. Tecalemit is a high-quality automotive workshop equipment importer, distributor and seller having business operations in Finland, Estonia and Lithuania.
The Stenhøj Group is a Danish family-owned company located in Barrit in Jutland, Denmark and has developed into the leading supplier of products and services especially for the automotive aftermarket. The Stenhøj Group consists of 15 subsidiaries in 11 countries. It employs 660 employees and exports to more than 60 countries worldwide.
Recent references
more referencesProcopé & Hornborg advises DL Data Oy in the acquisition by Verano, part of Nestit Group
Procopé & Hornborg advises DL Data Oy in the acquisition by Verano Eterno Oy, part of Nestit Group Ab. Post-transaction, DL Data will operate as a subsidiary of Verano. DL Data is an IT services company based in Lapua that provides IT maintenance, management, and support services to small and medium…
Reference – 6.5.2026
Gasgrid Finland Oy and Elering AS were advised on the Balticconnector gas pipeline insurance claim
Balticconnector was damaged at the start of October 2023 by Hong Kong registered vessel m/v NewNew Polar Bear and its anchor. Approximately six months after the accident, the repairs were completed, and the Balticconnector has been back in operation from April 2024 onwards. Our assignment included c…
Reference – 6.5.2026
Procopé & Hornborg represented a Dutch company in FAI arbitration proceedings and assisted in the subsequent enforcement of the arbitral award regarding the costs of the arbitration in Belgium
We successfully represented a Dutch company in FAI arbitration proceedings where the tribunal accepted our client’s arguments and decided that it did not have jurisdiction to decide on the merits of the dispute and made an order terminating the arbitration proceedings. Subsequently, we advised on th…
Reference – 30.4.2026