Reference – 3.2.2026

Procopé & Hornborg represented Aviator Airport Services Finland Oy in a dispute before the Court of Appeal

Main contact

Heidi Savolainen

Partner, Attorney at Law, Trained on the Bench

+358 40 0101 106

Procopé & Hornborg represented Aviator Airport Services Finland Oy in a complex dispute concerning the change of the ground handling services provider. The multi‑claimant case was legally significant, and the Court of Appeal upheld the lower court’s decision in favor of the company.

Procopé & Hornborg’s team consisted of Heidi Savolainen and Roosa Romppanen.

Related professionals

  • Heidi Savolainen

    Partner, Attorney at Law, Trained on the Bench

    +358 40 0101 106

  • Roosa Romppanen

    Senior Trainee

    +358 40 8338 003

Recent references

REFERENCE – 6.5.2026

Procopé & Hornborg advises DL Data Oy in the acquisition by Verano, part of Nestit Group

Procopé & Hornborg advises DL Data Oy in the acquisition by Verano Eterno Oy, part of Nestit Group Ab. Post-transaction, DL Data will operate as a subsidiary of Verano. DL Data is an IT services company based in Lapua that provides IT maintenance, management, and support services to small and medium…

Reference – 6.5.2026

REFERENCE – 6.5.2026

Gasgrid Finland Oy and Elering AS were advised on the Balticconnector gas pipeline insurance claim

Balticconnector was damaged at the start of October 2023 by Hong Kong registered vessel m/v NewNew Polar Bear and its anchor. Approximately six months after the accident, the repairs were completed, and the Balticconnector has been back in operation from April 2024 onwards. Our assignment included c…

Reference – 6.5.2026

REFERENCE – 30.4.2026

Procopé & Hornborg represented a Dutch company in FAI arbitration proceedings and assisted in the subsequent enforcement of the arbitral award regarding the costs of the arbitration in Belgium

We successfully represented a Dutch company in FAI arbitration proceedings where the tribunal accepted our client’s arguments and decided that it did not have jurisdiction to decide on the merits of the dispute and made an order terminating the arbitration proceedings. Subsequently, we advised on th…

Reference – 30.4.2026