Reference – 6.10.2022

Pohjolan Voima Oyj: Competition compliance programme with a training and electronic education tool

Main contact

Lotta Uusitalo

Partner, Attorney at Law, LL.M. (Bruges), Trained on the Bench

+358 40 8338 008

We designed competition compliance programme for Pohjolan Voima Oyj with an electronic education tool for the personnel. We also trained the group’s board members to identify risks associated with competition law.

Pohjolan Voima Oyj is one of Finland’s biggest energy companies. It’s share of the electricity produced in Finland is approximately one fifth. Compliance with competition law is a top priority for the company.

Related professionals

  • Lotta Uusitalo

    Partner, Attorney at Law, LL.M. (Bruges), Trained on the Bench

    +358 40 8338 008

Recent references

more references

REFERENCE – 6.5.2026

Procopé & Hornborg advises DL Data Oy in the acquisition by Verano, part of Nestit Group

Procopé & Hornborg advises DL Data Oy in the acquisition by Verano Eterno Oy, part of Nestit Group Ab. Post-transaction, DL Data will operate as a subsidiary of Verano. DL Data is an IT services company based in Lapua that provides IT maintenance, management, and support services to small and medium…

Reference – 6.5.2026

REFERENCE – 6.5.2026

Gasgrid Finland Oy and Elering AS were advised on the Balticconnector gas pipeline insurance claim

Balticconnector was damaged at the start of October 2023 by Hong Kong registered vessel m/v NewNew Polar Bear and its anchor. Approximately six months after the accident, the repairs were completed, and the Balticconnector has been back in operation from April 2024 onwards. Our assignment included c…

Reference – 6.5.2026

REFERENCE – 30.4.2026

Procopé & Hornborg represented a Dutch company in FAI arbitration proceedings and assisted in the subsequent enforcement of the arbitral award regarding the costs of the arbitration in Belgium

We successfully represented a Dutch company in FAI arbitration proceedings where the tribunal accepted our client’s arguments and decided that it did not have jurisdiction to decide on the merits of the dispute and made an order terminating the arbitration proceedings. Subsequently, we advised on th…

Reference – 30.4.2026

more references