Procopé & Hornborg advised Concria Oy in the sale of a 30% stake in the company to Sika AG
Main contact
We advised Concria Oy, a Finnish startup specializing in highly innovative concrete floors, in the sale of a 30% stake in the company to Sika AG. Concria has developed innovative concrete flooring technology that offers numerous benefits to contractors, architects, and property owners.
Sika is a leading global specialty chemicals company, focusing on manufacturing products for the building and automotive sectors. With subsidiaries in 103 countries and over 400 factories, Sika develops innovative technologies that drive sustainable transformations in the global construction and transportation industries. As part of this strategic investment, Concria will gain access to Sika’s extensive global distribution and production network.
Related professionals
Recent references
Procopé & Hornborg advises DL Data Oy in the acquisition by Verano, part of Nestit Group
Procopé & Hornborg advises DL Data Oy in the acquisition by Verano Eterno Oy, part of Nestit Group Ab. Post-transaction, DL Data will operate as a subsidiary of Verano. DL Data is an IT services company based in Lapua that provides IT maintenance, management, and support services to small and medium…
Reference – 6.5.2026
Gasgrid Finland Oy and Elering AS were advised on the Balticconnector gas pipeline insurance claim
Balticconnector was damaged at the start of October 2023 by Hong Kong registered vessel m/v NewNew Polar Bear and its anchor. Approximately six months after the accident, the repairs were completed, and the Balticconnector has been back in operation from April 2024 onwards. Our assignment included c…
Reference – 6.5.2026
Procopé & Hornborg represented a Dutch company in FAI arbitration proceedings and assisted in the subsequent enforcement of the arbitral award regarding the costs of the arbitration in Belgium
We successfully represented a Dutch company in FAI arbitration proceedings where the tribunal accepted our client’s arguments and decided that it did not have jurisdiction to decide on the merits of the dispute and made an order terminating the arbitration proceedings. Subsequently, we advised on th…
Reference – 30.4.2026